Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Saturday 14th Strikes Back – review



Director: Howard R Cohen

Release Date: 1988

Contains spoilers


The first Saturday the 14th movie was a bit of a stinker and so it was with trepidation that I sat down to watch the sequel and it was, without a doubt, most ill-conceived.

The basic story goes a little like this, Eddie (Jason Presson) and his family have inherited a house from an Uncle, who had just been executed, a strange gothic looking house – as they are – in suburbia. The family are odd to say the least, subsisting it seems on candy.

In the basement of the house there is a crack, from which steam escapes. The steam is evil and the crack is an opening for all the evils of the world to escape through. Eddie is approached by Charlene (Pamela Stonebrook), a vampire. This first encounter leads to a bizarre musical interlude.

One might wonder why, as the extended family starts acting odd, a vampire might approach Eddie and warn him of the end of the world on Saturday 14th. Well she is one of the bad guys but so, unbeknown to himself, is Eddie. He has been chosen as the new ruler of all evil and is destined to bring around the end of the world. The question is can he overcome his own nature and make everything right? The answer is, could you really care.

The first film, as I say, was rubbish but this really is bad with no amusing moments at all. The highlight is the vampire song routine and that was weird but not particularly funny or something worth watching the film for. Poor story matches the very poor effects that make early Power Rangers programmes look like high budget sfx shows.

The direction is pedestrian and the performances seemed in line with the quality of the movie, as though the actors involved really couldn’t be bothered trying when faced with such a rank script – and who can blame them.

Not a good film at all. 0.5 out of 10 is probably generous.

The imdb page is here.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Vamp or Not? Alucarda


This is a film that has consistently appeared on vampire filmographies and as such I watched it without thinking that I might be forced to write a ‘Vamp or Not?’ piece for it. However, as the film progressed I really felt that it was the only way to go. What we have is a tale of possession almost in the mode of “The Devils”, with injections of Carmilla (indeed Le Fanu is mentioned in the writing credits) and imagery that Pan’s Labyrinth would owe a debt to in years to come – not surprising as Del Torro cites director Juan López Moctezuma as an inspiration. The film is listed as being released in 1977.

Of course, in a ‘Vamp or Not?’ investigation we are going to have to start with the film’s title, which is the name of the central character played by Tina Romero. It doesn’t take much to realise that Alucarda is A Dracula reversed. There is one further hint (just about) to connect this with Stoker’s vampire, which I’ll mention at the appropriate time.

The film begins with the birth of Alucarda, in a crypt that is dominated by a statue of a Pan like creature. There is some kind of servant, who looks a little odd, and Alucarda’s mother (also played by Romero) tells the servant to take Alucarda to the convent and to not let him get her. Who this ‘him’ is, we never know – the devil? A pagan god? The answer doesn’t come, however once the baby has gone the mother looks fearful as noises fill the crypt and she begins to scream.

Cut forward fifteen years and Justine (Susana Kamini) is an orphan taken to the convent. She is led through the building by Sister Angélica (Tina French), past Dr Oszek (Claudio Brook) who is collecting his blind daughter, Daniela (Lili Garza). Justine is deposited in her room and Alucarda, her roommate, appears. Alucarda begins to show Justine her ‘secret things’ – which consist of general crap she has found. Thus starts their close friendship, which strongly hints at lesbianism.

Outside, at one point, they see a funeral procession. Alucarda says it is a funeral for Cynthia, who killed herself and because of this she is being taken to unhallowed ground. Now I mentioned overtones of Carmilla and here we see one. We have the two young girls and the hinted lesbianism, true, but here Justine shows her fear of death and Alucarda states, “Everyone must die but there can be happiness beyond death.” This is very similar to the line from Carmilla when observing a funeral, “Why you must die. Everyone must die; and all are happier when they do.”


In another moment away from the convent they meet a satyr like gypsy (also played by Claudio Brook) who offers them charms to protect them from the demons that infest the forest. Justine is wary but Alucarda follows him. They reach a gypsy encampment where a gypsy woman reads Justine’s palm, seeing only darkness and shadows. Alucarda looks at the satyr gypsy’s wares and picks up a knife – forged from the tears of a gypsy girl he says – and then suddenly the girls run in fear.

They end up at a crypt, the exterior draped with fabric, which seems familiar to Alucarda. They enter the crypt (where Alucarda was born and where she now claims she can hear the voices of the past) and Alucarda suggests that they make a pact of love in blood. Justine is scared, thus the pact does not happen, and Alucarda moves over to a coffin. Now I mentioned a further, ostensibly, Dracula connection. The coffin is marked Lucy Western – close enough one feels to Lucy Westenra to class as a reference. The coffin contains a desiccated corpse and noises, such as came for Alucarda’s mother, fill the tomb.

At a religious teaching, Father Lázaro (David Silva) tells the girls of possession and Justine faints. Alucarda is left with her in their room and starts ranting (in a possessed sort of way), pulling a crucifix from Justine. She mentions the pact again and the satyr gypsy appears. He helps them cut each other’s breast and they seal the pact with blood upon the lips and a kiss. Then Alucarda drinks the blood from her friends wound.

Cutting to Sister Angélica we see the nun praying and blood begins to seep from her face. Meanwhile the girls are with the gypsies and an orgy begins. The scene is strange, imagery abounding such as a Baphomet type goat headed creature – though it could be meant to be someone in a mask. Sister Angélica’s prayers culminate in her levitating and the gypsy fortune teller receives a wound to the neck, killing her.

From here on we hit fairly standard possession, nunsploitation material that culminates in an exorcism that kills Justine and sees Alucarda rescued by Dr Oszek (as he is a man of science not superstition). To this point we have had very little vampiric involvement, we have had references to Dracula and Carmilla, plus the sealing of a pact with blood (and blood drinking) but nothing definitive. There is also the fact that Justine is sensitive to sunlight, though Father Lázaro puts this down to her being possessed by a heliophobic demon. However the vampiric imagery does increase here on in.

Justine’s body has been laid in repose, watched over by nuns, when it is discovered that it has gone missing. We have actually seen the hand twitch. They find the body of the nun and she is burnt to a crisp. Later Father Lázaro visits the crispy nun and she starts to move, only to cease when the priest beheads the animated corpse. At this point the Doctor believes and realises he has left his daughter with Alucarda. Sister Angélica leads them to the crypt.

Here we get our most vampiric moments. Sister Angélica is alone and opens a coffin. Inside is Justine floating in blood – which matches the description of finding Carmilla at the end of LeFanu’s novel. She emerges, snarling like a beast, and approaches the nun but her approach is halted when Angélica implores God to help her.

However the Doctor and a monk called Felipe (Martin LaSalle) come in and start flinging holy water on Justine’s back, which burns her. Enraged she lunges at the nun and bites her neck, leaving her to die in a spray of blood. The young girl then falls to the floor and dissolves into a skeleton. The remainder of the film is about finding Alucarda and has a touch of Carrie as she starts burning people with her mind.

In the main this does not seem Vamp, it is a possession story. However the ending, in respect of Justine, has very vampiric overtones. Her possession came about through a blood rite, she is heliophobic (a trait common to vampires, demons and witches), after she dies she sleeps in a coffin of blood, she is burnt by holy water and rapidly decays to skeleton and she bites the neck of a victim – though no fangs are evident. All in all I would say this pushes the film to have a rightful place on vampire filmographies – though the majority of the film is more like the Devils than your standard genre piece.

The imdb page is here.

Competition

The competition closed last night, unfortunately there were no entries - thus no winner. I will endeavour to find a good home for the book however.

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Music: I am Ghost

It’s always nice to come across a newer band out of the blue, to just pick up the CD with no knowledge of what they are like, have a listen and think, ‘hmm… not bad at all’.

‘I am Ghost’ fall somewhere between Goth and post-hardcore, imagine if you would ‘Panic! At the Disco’ if they had metal balls coupled with symphonic and choral movements. There is also a definite obsession with vampires on their “Lovers’ Requiem” CD – which, of course, is no bad thing.

Vampiric imagery, such as shown here, is within the CD booklet and there is a track entitled “Pretty People Never Lie, Vampires Never Really Die”. Add to that the following lyrics;

From “Dark Carnival of the Immaculate”:

“Her eyes glow like heaven
Broken, unsound, cut her wings off
The night: a vampire trademark
Dead Man Walking Free”

And from: “We are Always Searching”

“It’s a cold dark night, Hallows’ Eve upon the crest
In a parking lot of vampires in suits to look their best.”


If you want to hear some for yourself, the band have a MySpace profile here and the official site is here.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

Dead of Night – review


Directed by: Dan Curtis

Release Date: 1977

Contains spoilers

This Dan Curtis vehicle, with screenplay by Richard Matheson, was actually the pilot for a series of horror shorts that never actually happened. Rather than concentrating on horror the film states that it is “three tales, one of mystery, one of imagination and one of terror.” The first segment, staring Ed Begley Jr, is “Second Chance” our tale of mystery and a clever little tale of accidental time travel. The last story, “Bobby”, is the tale of terror and is the best of the stories.

That leaves the tale of imagination, a story called “No such thing as a vampire”. I’m going to do my best not to wreck the twist at the end – which the region 4 DVD blurb quite happily shatters.

We see a woman, Alexis (Anjanette Comer), tossing and turning in her sleep. She awakens and puts her hand to her neck… then screams. Her screams bring the household running, including her husband, Dr Gheria (Patrick Macnee) and we see there is blood at her neck. As her husband holds her she says she is going to die.

Gheria orders supplies, not because he believes in vampires but because the traditional deterrents will put his wife’s mind at ease – he tells butler Karel (Elisha Cook Jr, who would later appear in Salem’s Lot). Rumour, however, is spreading and the servants are gossiping. Two want to leave.

When Gheria sleeps in his chair one night, we see something approach via a pov camera. It is a shame but there wasn’t much tension to this scene. It was obvious that Curtis was implying the vampire creeping up to Gheria but the atmosphere was lacking. As it is, it turns out to be Alexis who has been bitten again and is bleeding from the neck.

A horseman rides into the village. The place seems deserted and the couple of villagers he sees are terrified. He reaches the Gheria house and we discover that the horseman is Michael (Horst Buchholz), a student of the professor. The servants – except for Karel who has actually killed a vampire in his youth – have all left and Gheria now seems to believe. He hides his neck and then admits he too has been bitten. Karel has checked the graveyards but no sign of the vampire has been found… he needs Michael’s help…

This is as far, story wise, as I am inclined to go. The whole story is some twenty minutes and the twist should have been nice – if the blurb hadn’t let me see it a mile off. However, as I have indicated the story lacks a certain tension that it desperately needed. Indeed the whole segment came across as sub-Hammer.

Acting wise there is nothing really stand-out, though Macnee was great to see and carried that crisp, upper crust attitude we expect from the actor.

As always, I tend to score the vampire segment only and this deserves probably about 3.5 out of 10. Don’t let that put you off searching this out, however, as the final story – though none vampiric – has atmosphere and tension aplenty, a clever little story and is worth the entrance fee alone.

The imdb page is here.

Friday, July 27, 2007

What’s New Scooby-Doo? – The Vampire Strikes Back – review – TV Episode


Directed by: Unknown

First Aired: 2003

Contains spoilers

You know there were always cartoons that you look back on with fond memories and for me Scooby-Doo was one of them, though like many kids I fell out with them when they introduced Scrappy-Doo into the mix. Recent years have seen a revival with straight to video features, live action films and new series including this one – which thankfully are sans Scrappy-Doo (with one notable and forgivable exception).


This specific episode was from the second series and features the whole Scooby gang, Fred (Frank Welker), Velma (Mindy Cohn), Daphne (Grey DeLisle), Shaggy (Casey Kasem) and of course Scooby-Doo (also voiced by Frank Welker).


The episode starts with the Hex Girls, an all girl pop-Goth band, shooting a video. The band, consisting of Luna (Kimberly Brooks), Dusk (Jane Wieldin) and Thorn (Jeniffer Hale), are recurring characters having been in two of the Scooby-Doo features ("Scooby-Doo and the Witches Ghost" and "Scooby-Doo and the Legend of the Vampire"). The shoot is in the Fortescu Castle in Transylvania and is interrupted by a vampire.


The gang have been invited to watch the shoot and reach the castle, taking out the rickety bridge on route thus cutting escape routes, only to discover that the shoot is plagued by the vampire. The show then cuts knowingly across standard Scooby-Doo formulaic conventions as Fred suggests they set a trap, rather than look for clues, and uses Velma as bait rather than using Shaggy and Scooby. Thus the vampire is caught in the first few minutes.


An unmasking, of sorts, follows. I say ‘of sorts’ as the man is wearing makeup rather than a mask. Of course, having just arrived, they do not know who he is but that mystery is solved by Castle owner Owen DeCassle (James Arnold Taylor) who says he is Steve Fortescu (also voiced by Taylor), the son of those who sold the castle to DeCassle. With the bridge out he is placed in a dungeon cell for the night but warns that the real vampire will come.

And come he does but could it be the real vampire or is someone helping Steve escape his cell?


Lore wise we couldn’t expect too much from a short children’s cartoon and what we get seems at odds with standard lore. Garlic is effective, when the vampire trips over a garland! When reading a book on vampires Daphne discovers that they are able to leave their tombs once a year to hunt for their true love – a bizarre lore addition that owes much to the works of Dan Curtis (who fairly much invited the reincarnated love aspect of vampire films).


We also get the vanishing of both one of the Hex girls and Fred, leaving behind only a bat in each case. This leads to the assumption that a vampire can turn someone into a bat, rather than turn into one themselves. This addition was to give an on-running comedy vein where Shaggy and Scooby try to find Fred the bat.


I should also mention that we get a spooky butler type by the name of Retchfield, who keeps a pet bug on a leash. An obvious reference to Dracula and the character Renfield. Plus we see Vlad’s dentists as the kids drive to the castle at the beginning.

All told this seems a fun episode for the kids and yet perhaps it doesn’t have the nuances necessary for an adult audience, but those, like me, who grew up with the show will enjoy the self-effacing references to standard Scooby-Doo plot.


The animation is nice and crisp, and fairly bright – again very kid friendly. The voice acting is good enough, though again aimed solely towards children

The story, unfortunately, is curtailed by length, age considerations and music. There is the obligatory song during a chase but we also get the Hex Girls’ song at the beginning and a rendition by them of the Scooby-Doo theme at the end. Good fun for the kids though, if my son’s reaction was anything to go by as we watched it together on Boomerang. 5 out of 10.

The imdb page is here.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

I’m Back

Whitby Abbey

And now a very happily married man. You just know it’s right when your bride walks down the aisle (do registry offices have aisles?) holding a wooden stake rather than a bouquet… I kid you not.

DraculaAnyway, post wedding we spent a few days in Whitby – where else? First off I want to tell you about the B&B we stayed in. The Bats and Broomsticks is a gothic themed guest house and I knew we’d feel right at home when we arrived and saw the life sized Dracula outside.

Vampire in TransitOnce inside, what a place… coffin in the hallway, four-poster bed in the room and by the bed a copy of Dracula. The place is beautiful and many thanks to Tish and Kev for a wonderful place to stay. In fact, I was so impressed I am putting a permanent link in the sidebar.

from the Dracula experienceOf course Whitby has a strong Dracula connection and we visited the Abbey, as well as the Bram Stoker’s Dracula Experience. There is a Dracula tour but unfortunately on the night it was held we were both a little weary and the weather, which had been astoundingly good that day, was turning a little unfriendly. Next time…

Thanks for the well wishes we received from folks, normal blogging shall resume from tomorrow…

Friday, July 20, 2007

Hiatus

I am taking a brief hiatus… but trust me it is for the best of reasons.

After 12 years together myself and my beautiful partner, Sarah, are getting married tomorrow.

Whilst the hiatus is ongoing do have a look at the competition I announced earlier in the week.

Picture nicked from dragons eye.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Blood dancers – review


Director: J R McGarrity

Release date: 2004

Contains spoilers

Some times a film gets ideas above its station, although this is not necessarily a bad thing. Artistic additions into a cheap digi-shot film can work and can fail, it really does depend. In this case we get a combination of the two with some nice visual effects and awful sound effects.

The film starts with a vampire, Gisella (Gabrielle Abitol), being tied in ropes composed of thousands of knots and then walled up. She makes the point that if she dies the other vampires, who are doing the walling up, will die also. But the vampires have a plan.

It is an intriguing start but then the basic story of this film proves itself to be very simple indeed. Cherokee (Elizabeth Hayden Smith) and her friend Lorna (Teresa Bianca Sciortino) work in a strip joint as cocktail waitresses. Cherokee wants more, however. She intends to dance in the amateur night and be spotted as a dancer.

There is competition however in the form of Erica (Kerry Ann Rohr), Clarice (Myla Marquez) and Elyse (Aime Wolf), three vampires. Elyse eventually wins the prize, but she gets talking to Cherokee, gives her the prize money as a tip and her card – offering to give her pointers. They do tell her that they are vampires, though she thinks it is just a name.

The vampires then take two guys back to their house and feed on them with an assortment of housebound vampires. This is a strange aspect to the film. The three main vampires look normal whilst the others seem twisted and monstrous. It is also here that we get one of the artistic aspects that works well. The vampires are filmed in almost a stop motion way, which gives them a disjointed movement style and makes them feel otherwordly.

Anyway Cherokee goes to the house to return the money and meets Anna (Shelly Varod) who warns her away. We can highlight here the artistic addition that doesn’t work at all. Through the film there is a tendency to put effects on the dialogue, it sounds awful and makes it difficult to actually hear what is going on. Anyway, as I say, Anna warns Cherokee off, but is stopped by some ‘from coffin’ telepathy when she goes too far with her warnings. Anna does tell her that if she wants to meet Elyse she must come back at night.

She does that and Elyse then does a night time visitation at Cherokee’s apartment and bites the girl. This makes her sensitive to silver and gives a thirst for Elyse’s blood. It is up to Lorna and Vick (Matteo Southwell), a pizza guy with a crush on Lorna, to rescue her.

What this film does well is play with vampiric lore. Cherokee is allowed to drink a little, which makes her a daytime servant like Anna – or a daywalker as they refer to them. If she had drunk more she would become a full fledged vampire, equal to Elyse. The vampires keep Gisella alive by feeding her blood through a tube and have used knotted ropes to hold her given a vampire’s compulsion to undo knots – begging the question how could they use the rope without falling pray to the compulsion to untie the knots themselves.

In a twist on vampires need inviting in, Vick and Lorna keep the vampires out by pasting notes on the doors telling them they are not welcome. It was done as a humour piece but worked better as a twist on traditional lore. When we see Elyse’s eyes in her coffin there is a funky skin thing going on, that looked like bad effects, but later we discover that they sleep with face masks on, leading to a final confrontation with face masks and rollers in the vampire’s hair.

A couple of FBI agents are thrown into the mix but they really didn’t work. One suspects they were meant to either be humorous or a statement about the paranoia prevalent within Western security services but the film would have worked better without them.

The acting is poor to average throughout, although Matteo Southwell comes across as very personable and natural.

All in all this is a cheap film and a little mismatched. There is interesting use of lore, but also artistic effects that sometimes work and, at other times, totally fail. Not the greatest movie but there are many worse films out there. 2.5 out of 10.

The imdb page is here.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Lips of Blood – review


Director: Jean Rollin

Release Date: 1975

Contains spoilers

This was the first film by Rollin that I ever saw and that may be the reason why I love the film so much. In many respects it fails compared to some of the director’s efforts, it is a dreamscape like many of his movies but has a fairly expressive back-story that needs perhaps a little too much dialogue to explain – a fact that perhaps interrupts the flow of imagery to a degree. I don’t really care, I love the movie.

The film begins with a van drawing up on a Paris street and two men carrying what is obviously a wrapped up body, they are led by a woman. They get to a crypt and enter, taking the body to a coffin. As the men leave to get another body the woman looks at the ‘corpse’ in its wrapping, it is clearly still breathing. We only see two bodies interred this way but there are actually, we discover later, four. They lid the coffin and place a cross at the door before leaving.

Frederic (Jean-Loup Phillipe) is at a party with his mother (Nathalie Perry). He sees a photo for a perfume advert and the castle in it triggers a memory. He remembers being a young boy (played by Serge Rollin) who was lost and found the castle. Inside was a girl in white, Jennifer (Annie Belle). She allows him to sleep there whilst she leaves. In the morning, just before dawn, she wakes him and tells him that his mother is worried.

That is all he remembers but his mother denies any knowledge. It seems he has very little memory of his childhood, after his father died. He tries, therefore, to track the castle down himself. He goes to the photographer but she tells him that she has been paid to forget all about the castle. In a very quick turn around she ends up naked and telling him to meet her that evening at the aquarium – where she will be doing a shoot – and she will get the details for him.

That evening he is walking the streets and enters a cinema that has a poster for Rollin’s film the Nude Vampire, though the cinema is actually showing another Rollin’s film, Shiver of the Vampire. Actually on a recent Zombie Astronaut podcast I fell into the trap of saying the film showing was the former film – sorry zomb.

In the cinema he sees the girl and she is exactly the same as she was. He follows her and sees her outside a cemetery, where she vanishes. He climbs in, finds her and follows her to the crypt from the beginning of the film. As he enters he knocks the cross down, opens a coffin and sees a bat. He legs it and we see four vampires leave the coffins. A note here about these vampires, two of them are played by Rollin regulars the Castel twins, the other two have a thing about see-through chiffon dresses – the poor actresses must have been rather cold! We should also note the comedy fangs, which are a shame really.

Outside the cemetery there is a woman who calls him by name and claims to be the girl in white – twenty years on. He says she doesn’t look like her but she tells him it doesn’t matter and leads him off. Meanwhile the vampires have a bit of a feast on some poor random chap wandering by.

The woman leads him through a decrepit area of the city to an apartment where he flat out proves she is not who she says by mentioning a toy he gave the girl, which she has no knowledge of. She locks him in and runs off but is got by the vampires. Jennifer is looking at the apartment and crying and two of the vampire go up and free him.

Frederic then goes to the aquarium and sees a shady looking man leave. He finds the photographer dead and spots the man at an underground station. He follows him onto a train but the man pulls a gun out of his briefcase and Frederic finds himself running for his life, which is again saved by the vampires.

He gets home ranting about ‘them’ trying to kill him, causing his mother to make a call whilst he is out of the room. He leaves and is grabbed, injected and put in an ambulance. In a straitjacket he is led to the doctor (Paul Bisciglia) who is going to give him electro shock therapy.

As it is we have realised that the two nurses are the vampire twins who pull down their masks and get the doctor allowing Frederic to escape. Suffice it to say that he discovers where the castle is and goes there and then the whole sordid story comes out.

Jennifer used to live with his family but contracted vampirism. She managed to infect four girls before his mother summoned the courage to stake her. Her courage failed, however, when it came to beheading her and so she was locked in her coffin. The four vampire girls were then sealed in the tomb to stop the spread but now his mother and her friends are going to destroy the girls and expect him to destroy Jennifer. He is also told that Jennifer killed his father.

As always with Rollin we are in a dreamscape – or more accurately a nightmare.
The entire film, to me, has an oedipal quality but is, even more so, about breaking away from the mother figure by a young man (I say young he was meant to be in his thirties) and moving on to a lover/partner. The mother is the true villain of the piece; although her motives might have been to stop the spread of vampirism they were also to keep her son tied to her. She clearly paid the photographer off and then had her killed, set up the fake Jennifer to distract him and was quite happy to have her son institutionalised rather than find the girl he loved.

Conversely the vampires are the heroes of the piece and, despite a random killing all their other acts seem to be in Frederic’s defence.

Perhaps more disturbing is the knowledge that Jennifer, in Rollin’s original concept, was Frederic’s sister. That concept seemed to be dropped, however, and there is a real chemistry between the two actors in the leads.

Lore wise the main thing of note, which was none standard, was the concept that a trapped vampire could project itself. Jennifer says that she could, at first, project her vision and then her spirit but Frederic was unable to see her until he remembered her.

A bizarrely engrossing film, strangely bare in soundtrack, the film bombed at the box office and so Rollin filmed a couple of hardcore scenes and re-released the film as an X-rated piece entitled “Suck me, vampire” . The film as Lips of Blood is as close to the director’s original vision as we can get – I say this because the four week shoot was cut down to three due to finance issues.

I really like this one and it is a good introduction to Rollin as, although it is surreal, it has a fairly straight story. That straight story is a curse as well as a blessing for the newcomer to Rollin, however, as it perhaps does contain plot holes and logic jumps that are irrelevant once you realise that Rollin is all about symbolism and dreams. 7.5 out of 10.

The imdb page is here.