This was a 2025 feature, directed by Harry Aspinwall and the title kinds of says it all. For context I am fascinated by the idea of vampiric buildings and actually wrote about them for Palgrave’s Handbook of the Vampire. Many fans of the traditional vampire form will likely baulk at the idea, but I accept a very broad spectrum of what is a vampire or vampiric.
Some may also baulk at this film as a piece of cinema; almost entirely using static cameras in various rooms of the titular house, to describe it as a slow burn might actually be an understatement. The house has seen better days, unfurnished as wallpaper peels etc. but its sparsely modern look undermines a traditional Gothic air that may have added atmosphere. And yet, I did find myself drawn in.
![]() |
| view of the man |
The film takes us through the static cameras so that we can explore the house. Then there is a distant peel of thunder as cars pull up. There are four people come to view the house, shown in by a man (Clive Russell, Neverwhere & Dracula (2020)). He tells them about the house but never leaves the vestibule, visible to us through the glass of the door. As the family look around a sound builds in the background and one by one the people just vanish, the only trace a piece of clothing that flutters down, in one case. Later we see the man eating a Pot Noodle and talking to the house.
![]() |
| the house speaks |
At night there is a knock at the door and then the sound of breaking glass and a girl (Bobby Rainsbury) climbs in. She, we discover, is estranged from her father but whether they lived once in the house or nearby was not clear to me. She is searching for him and eventually discovers he is in a hospital or nursing home. The house seems to take to her. Early on we see words on screen, and it feels like chapter titles at first, but we soon discover that it is the house talking to her, the voice silent to us. This establishes that the house is sentient. The conversations are driven, acting wise, by her as the house dialogue is only shown to us as subtitles and sometimes not at all.
![]() |
| squatting |
The film then is about her grief re her father and her avoiding the other man when he visits the house; it turns out that he is not an estate agent but the owner of the house deliberately drawing people there (and trying to avoid a compulsory purchase order that will lead to its demolition). Is it Vamp though? Well, the house, we have established, is sentient and is described as hungry. Reference is made to when the house was not hungry (which, if you read the film that the girl once lived there, then we can assume it was not hungry then) and also that its hunger is increasing. How it feeds is unknown, the victims vanish somewhere and whether it then digests them or their energy, is silent in the text. The sentient aspect of the house can detach from the house and reattach to something (a replica of the house in this case). All in all, I am going yes to it being a vampiric building but appreciate that others may disagree.
The imdb page is here.
On Demand @ Amazon US
On Demand @ Amazon UK






























